By Dan Luiton
The Anti-Terror and Peace: IFLAC Anthology 2016 is a powerful and unique instrument to fight terror with powerful words of peace. In this book the main focus is to denounce terrorism, war, and violence and try to bring peace to our world. It contains, moving poetry, short stories, essays and interesting articles from different authors around the world. They surely succeed to express their feelings against violence and thus promote peace.
As a reader, I could not stop reading, each poem made me want to do something to bring peace. When I was reading the story of Father Francisco Jose de Raoux Humans or Wolves, about the wolf it made me reflect that even though he killed and ate those people from the community he was still forgiven and they cried when he died. This is a metaphor even though some humans can do terrible acts against other humans (like the Terrorist in Columbia, who were recently forgiven and they became a peaceful citizens), they can still forgive them and educate them so they won’t commit acts of terror again. The most interesting part of the story is that the community cried when he died, meaning they had a great emotional attachment to the wolf. This is interesting because the metaphor of this is that it doesn’t end in forgiving the person but also love them.
In the story of “What Peace, My Teacher?” by Adiela Londono de Copete, there was a student who was not writing a short answer about peace but rather played with his fingers. This student did not write anything because he did not see any peace anywhere due to his life’s experiences and the only joy to his life was coming to school. It was hard to understand at first but then I realize it’s difficult for him to define peace if it did not existed in his home.
One of the stories that I really liked is that one of Maria Cristina Azcona “Humanity and its Auto-Destruction,” where she states that even if humans are auto destroying themselves “the love and poetry are not dead.” “ Even if the starting point to rebuild [ours lives] is like the phoenix, rise from our ashes, as it has occurred since the world began.” In other words,the message of this wonderful story is: it says not giving up even if everything looks destructive.
I think that this unique IFLAC ANTHOLOGY has an important message that is to show and teach IFLAC motto that: the pen is mightier than the sword. Moreover, I think Ernestina Ramirez Escobar’s quote resumes all the Anthology’s message “War brings war. Let us join our voices in peace instead.” Amazing Anthology, that should be read by all, all over the world, and I highly recommend.
By Dan Luiton
Review of the book: FROM THE NILE TO THE JORDAN by Prof. Ada Aharoni
As a Mexican-American attending a liberal school in a conservative state in the USA, I have always seen the creation of the State of Israel as a horror event for the Palestinians, due to Palestinian false propaganda, but after reading this book it changed my perspective over this controversial issue. I, like many other students, was influenced by Palestinian students’ organizations around my school campus that Israel is an evil state that commits crimes against Palestinians; not only commits them but also legalizes laws that violate human rights. However, being raised with a Christian background, I was taught that I should always be pro- Israel no matter what they do which made me be indifferent about the Arab- Israeli conflict.
However, after reading the great historical novel: From the Nile to the Jordan, by Prof. Ada Aharoni, it enabled me to see a different perspective of the Arab- Israeli Conflict. Now I see the necessity for the Jews from the Arab countries, who were were uprooted from Arab Countries, though they had been flourishing Jewish Communities for more than 2500 years – to create a State of their own. As I read the book I felt sorrow for the heroine Inbar , not being able to identify herself as an Egyptian and trying to figure out what she was. Even though Jews were in Egypt for more than two thousand years and much before the Arabs arrived in the seventh century, they were not considered Egyptians. The Egyptian government labelled them as “welcome guests” of Egypt, but not citizens. This made me wonder how people can live in a country where they were born, and yet are not considered citizens even if their family had been there for centuries!
In this special book, I also learnt about the anti-Semitism that Europe was facing through centuries, which led to the Holocaust, and to the murder of six million Jews. This sad history was reflected in the book through Raoul’s tragic story and the influence on his character. In my opinion, these reasons enabled Jews to urgently find the need to be reunited and establish their own State. Now I see that the creation of the legal State of Israel, by the United Nations in 1948, was not a whim, but it was a crucial need due to the tragic historical circumstances they had been facing in East and in the West.
Later, when Inbar explained the tragic events that led to the “Second Exodus of the Jews from Egypt”, it made me open my eyes that the Palestinians were not only the victims in the creation of the State, but also the Sephardi Jews. The Egyptian government took away the work permits of the Jews, and all their wealth, before they sent out of the country, making them start from zero once they immigrated. Some died of heartbreak or got killed during the process. Then, coming to Israel, although they suffered some discrimination from the Ashkenazi-Jews against Oriental Sephardi Jews,
they managed to adapt to the new country, Israel, and they contributed a great deal in the building and defense of the new country.
This book made me understand deeply the Arab – Israeli conflict, by showing me another view, and historical facts I did not know. Also, it promotes peace between Arabs and Israelis because when the Palestinians find out that the million Jews who were ousted from Arab countries had gone through the same tragic experience as they had, and that the Palestinians are certainly not the only victims of the Arab- Israeli Conflict. Inbar’s character and actions in the book, promotes the idea and goal of peace between Jews and Arabs, and it also made me fully understand the crucial necessity of the establishing of the State of Israel.
For all the reasons above, and so much more, I think it is an amazing historical novel. I warmly recommend it to understand better the Arab- Israeli Conflict, and to encourage peace between Israelis and Palestinians, like between Israel and Egypt, and Israel and Jordan. This excellent book is a treasure and a truly eye–opener!
Shimon Peres first part of his excellent PEACE PLAN is the following: “There are some 400 million Arabs in the Middle East, and close to 1.3 billion Muslims in the world. Some 60% of them are under the age of 25. It looks to me like they won’t be able to pull themselves out of their current situation on their own. There are already some 130 million young people in the Middle East with smartphones. There are 9 million students, which is not a lot. The problem is that once they finish university, they cannot find work, because there is no high tech. None of their leaders did what should be done: not President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi of Egypt, not King Salman of Saudi Arabia and not King Abdullah of Jordan.
“The solution must come from the universities, using the model that already exists in Israel. There must be greenhouses for students, high tech and entrepreneurship. There are now 13,000 startup companies in Israel that were founded by students. Some of these students are already millionaires. They go to school, become entrepreneurs, receive money from investors and return the loans once they succeed. This model should be copied by the Arab world. Israel is a high-tech nation, but high tech has no flags. It is universal. The Middle East should be blanketed with high tech. I have been busy recruiting eight gigantic corporations for this project. High tech now has $24 trillion in reserve, $6 trillion of it in the United States. The investment funds are enormous.
“I tell them, ‘Friends, start thinking about the war on terror. Otherwise, it will destroy you. And no, you don’t have to kill terrorists. You have to kill terrorism. You have to create high tech and jobs. We need to recruit the Israeli Arab community for this, as well as high-tech leaders around the world. I had a talk with Michael Dell not too long ago. He recently merged his company with another huge company. There are hundreds of billions of dollars available now. I asked him, ‘Michael, what are you going to do with all that money?’ We agreed to meet in Davos. Trust me, we don’t need governments. They’re just a big headache with very little money. We need to recruit international corporations. I’m in talks with Cisco, Facebook, Google, everyone.”
“I tell them that there are four things, which must be brought to the Middle East: internet, broadband, the “cloud” and digital medicine. We have to present an enormous Marshall Plan for information, not money. We have to transform the universities into centers of entrepreneurship and technology. The leaders in the Middle East are making huge mistakes. Sisi is wasting billions of dollars on the Suez Canal. That is a mistake. I would not be surprised if I woke up tomorrow morning and read that Egypt or Saudi Arabia has collapsed. We have to propose this plan as quickly as possible. Anyone who wants can join.”
Peres then comes to the second stage of his plan, the political stage. “We were just speaking about John Kerry and his incredible diligence in resolving the Iranian crisis without a war, or even a cold war, and without the United Nations. He is completely dedicated to the cause. There isn’t an ounce of cynicism in him. That’s a huge thing in politics. He is genuine, and he put together an option that the whole world supported, apart from Israel. Now they are talking about imposing an agreement [on Israel and the Palestinians]. Why impose it? Netanyahu already agreed to a two-state solution with blocs of settlementsremaining under Israeli sovereignty. But Abbas can’t agree to Netanyahu’s settlement blocs. The Palestinians recognize three settlement blocs, while Netanyahu has seven or eight in mind. That is why the whole issue of a freeze on settlement construction is a waste of time. The world needs to present a plan for an arrangement based on what has already been agreed upon. The plan should be passed by the General Assembly of the United Nations, and not the Security Council. It should be put on the table, without imposing anything on the parties. Anyone who wants can take part in it. It will be a kind of global statement of intent. Israel cannot function without the enlightened world, yet there are already companies that avoid Israel because of its policies. The Palestinians can’t stay behind either. They will have to join this big Marshall Plan. Accepting the arrangement will be a precondition for joining. That’s the whole idea.”
I asked Peres who will get his plan running. Who will be responsible for its implementation? “The world,” he answered. “Take Kerry, for example. He is capable. I went to see [Russian President Vladimir] Putin not too long ago. I said to him, ‘I’m 92 years old, and you’re 62. What do you want to do for the next 30 years? Conquer America?’ He told me no. ‘Do you think that America wants to conquer you?’ He answered, ‘Obviously not.’ Then I asked him if he has a hard time talking to [President Barack] Obama. ‘No,’ he said. ‘Obama is actually a nice guy.’ That’s when I told him that even though I don’t engage in espionage, I will be telling the Americans everything I talk about with him. He laughed. ‘I know,’ he said. ‘That’s why I’m talking to you.’ I like to think that it was because of this kind of mediation too that they [Americans and Russians] started to speak to one another. I think that the Russians will agree and the Chinese will agree. The Europeans will agree. [German Chancellor] Mrs. [Angela] Merkel will agree. After all, the whole world agrees with the two-state solution. It is not being imposed on anyone. It will be the consensus solution presented by the entire world, just as it happened with the Iranian issue. Instead of threats, the parties need to receive incentives. Then, anyone who agrees to sign on to and implement the program will join this immense Marshall Plan to advance information and progress.”
I asked him how he would convince Netanyahu, and how he would neutralize the pro-Israel American Israel Public Affairs Committee lobby and Netanyahu’s billionaires. “You can’t buy everything with money,” Peres told me. “Even [US billionaire Sheldon] Adelson can’t really buy the whole world. He doesn’t have $24 trillion. Netanyahu has the evangelicals in his pocket, but he lost the Democrats. Russia will agree. I am sure of that. Based on long talks that I have had, I am convinced that the Americans will, too, even though there are still some people there who believe Netanyahu’s promises. After all, Netanyahu agreed to a demilitarized Palestinian state, to three settlement blocs [remaining under Israeli control] and to a pre-agreed and just solution for the [Palestinian] refugee problem. We will resolve the problem of Jerusalem at a later date in two stages, rather than in one. Abbas will agree to that. I spoke to him about it. In the first stage, each religion will be responsible for its holy sites. The UN General Assembly will formulate and approve all the details. The agreement will be placed before it, as a kind of global statement, laying out the way forward. All the nations of the world will be partners in this agreement and act accordingly. Anyone who does not will be a pariah. I don’t think that there is anyone crazy enough here to reject this. Anyone who does reject it will remain behind. This opportunity will offer a veritable paradise, with trillions of dollars of investment in technology, science, universities and high tech. That is the future. People will not want to stay stuck in the past.’’
Nine months after this conversation, Peres suffered a stroke, which led to his death two weeks later, on Sept. 28. His final plan expressed his deep frustration with the Palestinian side, but also with the Israeli side. Nevertheless, he refused to give up. He hoped to harness his enormous love for science, technology and progress to benefit his other great passion: striving for peace.
Book Review: Anti-Terror and Peace
In a world desperately longing to eradicate despotism and violence, the power of the written word is prominent and palpable in the 2016 IFLAC anthology “Anti-Terror and Peace.”
Responding to increasing turmoil in the world, Professor Ada Aharoni founded IFLAC, the International Forum for the Literature and Culture of Peace, in 1999 as a way to bridge the gap between cultures and promote peace and understanding through writing and art.
Through IFLAC she publishes a daily digest online and an anthology every second year.
The 2016 anthology is a compendium of essays, art, short stories, poetry, and haiku—which Aharoni calls “peace works”—by 23 authors living in various countries around the globe.
Through eloquent, authentic, and personal writings, the anthology aims to promote peace among peoples and nations by shining a light on suffering and the extraordinary people who managed to surmount the fear and hardship they have encountered. The publication is interlaced with “peace art,” and Aharoni, as chief editor, chose all of the articles and art included in it.
With reports of pain, suffering, abuse of power, and inhumanity increasing year after year, and with terrorists causing a lot of these problems, Aharoni decided to focus the 2016 anthology on anti-terrorism, a secondary message to the usual one of promoting peace for all.
In the introduction she calls terrorism “this new cancer obnoxiously spreading all over our world.”
Topics of the pieces range from the Rwandan genocide, conflict in Israel, Palestine, and Africa, and terrorism and the terrorist experience, to the Holocaust. Some contain graphic images of mistreatment, death, and genocide, making them heartfelt but difficult to read dispassionately.
One of the essays is Canadian psychotherapist Khalid Sohail’s “The Psychology of Suicide Bombers.” He also contributed “A Peaceful World.”
In the former he cites seven factors that precipitate a rational, law-abiding person turning into a suicide bomber. Sohail then explains the tragedy of indoctrinated people being used to further the cause of a cultish leader by participating in a suicide mission, believing that their “sacred martyrdom” will be rewarded after death.
In “The End of Terrorism,” Apostolos John Paschos of Greece describes why man was created: “He was created for the purpose of assessing the values of life, of free people, justice, dignity, respect, virtue, ethics, peace, harmony, to create all together a blissful and harmonious society globally.”
Aharoni, born in Egypt and now living in Israel, has been writing poems since she was 10 years old. In an interview included in the anthology, she talks about the significance of poetry: “By being a platform that expresses what the majority of the people of the world crave for—peace and freedom from terror, violence, destruction, and wars—we can influence the politicians that wars cannot resolve conflicts.”
So it is no wonder that one of the most relevant, and the largest, section of the anthology presents 54 poems that decry the realities of terrorism, feed the world’s need for hope, and express the desire we all feel to eradicate conflict.
Poems about terrorists and violent horrors are balanced with poems about humanity, peace, and the need for people to work toward peace in the many troubled countries of the world.
The anthology informs about the nightmare that is terrorism and also highlights the cry for an end to war and terrorism echoed around our world by the majority of humankind.
“Anti-Terror and Peace” is available from Amazon. For information about IFLAC, visit: http://www.iflac.wordpress.com
The article at the EPOCH TIMES: http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/2133851-promoting-peace-through-writing-and-art/